Action Needed on Bill to Provide Loan Forgiveness
for Social Workers Who Choose Child Welfare
February 26, 2003
THE ISSUE AT HAND
On Thursday, February 13, 2003, the Child Protective
Services Student Loan Forgiveness Act was introduced in
both the House and the Senate. The House bill (H.R.
734)
was introduced by Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH). The
Senate companion bill (S.
409) was
introduced by Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH), giving the legislation
important bipartisan support. Cosponsors are listed
below.
The bill creates a demonstration
program designed to bring more highly trained individuals
(those
with BSWs or MSWs) into the child welfare system and keep
them in the field for longer periods of time. Only
students who obtain either a BSW or MSW and are employed
in a state child welfare agency, or public or private agency
under contract with the state, would be eligible. Loan
forgiveness would begin in the third year of employment. After
the third consecutive year of employment, 20 percent of
the total amount of the loan would be forgiven; after the
fourth consecutive year, 30 percent; and after the fifth
consecutive year, 50 percent.
The forgiveness program covers
the Stafford and Ford Direct Loan programs only. Students with
PLUS Loans or Consolidation Loans would not be eligible. Loan
forgiveness would only be available for loans awarded after
the date of enactment of the legislation. Loan
forgiveness could not be applied retroactively. Funding
of $20 million is authorized for the program. If
the program is approved, Congress would then have to take
additional action to fund the program through the appropriations
process.
For additional details, see the bill
summary on NASW's Child
Welfare Issues page.
ACTION NEEDED
(1) If your Senator and/or Representative
are among the original cosponsors of the bill thank them
for their support.
Cosponsors of H.R. 734:
Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH)
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)
Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA)
Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA)
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
Rep. Timothy Ryan (D-OH)
Cosponsors of S. 409:
Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH)
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
(2) If your Senators and
Representative are not among the cosponsors, urge them
to become cosponsors.
SAMPLE MESSAGES
A sample letter has been posted on NASW's
Congress Web to email or fax to Members of Congress.
A sample phone message follows. All
Members can be reached through the Capitol switchboard
at 202-225-3121. Individual telephone numbers, fax
numbers, and email addresses are available through NASW's
Congress Web www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/grassroots/congressweb.asp. If
you make a phone call, please let us know via email at advocacy@naswdc.org.
Sample Phone Message – For COSPONSORS
My name is ________________ from _________________
(city, state). As a constituent, professional social
worker, and member of the National Association of Social
Workers, I am calling to thank Senator (or Representative)
____________ (last name) for cosponsoring the Child Protective
Services Student Loan Forgiveness Act (S. 409) (or H.R.
734).
This legislation addresses a critical
part of the ongoing crisis in child welfare agencies around
the country. High vacancy and turnover rates are
having a negative impact on outcomes for our most vulnerable
children and families. Recruiting and retaining better
qualified professionals will help to improve those outcomes.
I appreciate the Senator’s (or Representative’s)
support. Thank you.
Sample Phone Message – For NON-COSPONSORS
My name is ________________ from _________________
(city, state). As a constituent, professional social
worker, and member of the National Association of Social
Workers, I am calling to urge Senator (or Representative)
____________ (last name) to cosponsor the Child Protective
Services Student Loan Forgiveness Act (S. 409) (or H.R.
734).
This legislation will help to address
the ongoing crisis in child welfare agencies around the
country. It is designed to get better qualified professionals
into the child welfare system and keep them there. Current
high vacancy and turnover rates are negatively impacting
the lives of some of our most vulnerable children and their
families. Without aggressive action, the situation
will only worsen in the future.
I hope I can count on the Senator’s (or
Representative’s) support for this legislation. Thank
you.
TIMING
The Child Protection Services Student
Loan Forgiveness Act is not expected to move through the
legislative process as a separate bill, but be incorporated
into the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act (HEA). While
there is no set timetable for moving HEA, it is important
to start building support for the bill, so contacts
should be made as soon as possible.
BACKGROUND
This
legislation builds on a loan forgiveness program created
under the
Perkins loan program in the Higher
Education Act (HEA) Amendments of 1992. The Perkins
program is targeted toward teachers. However, a number
of other disciplines are also eligible, including “full-time
qualified professional providers (including social workers)
of early intervention services (as defined by the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act) in a public or other nonprofit
program under public supervision” and “full-time employees
of an eligible public or private nonprofit child or family
service agency who is providing or supervising the provision
of services to both high-risk children (including those
at risk of abuse or neglect) who are from low-income communities
and the families of such children.” For qualifying
loans made on or after July 23, 1992, 15 percent is forgiven
for the first two years of full-time employment, 20 percent
for the third and fourth years, and 30 percent for the
fifth year.
Several
problems have been documented with the 1992 program that
hamper
social workers’ access,
including the targeting of teachers, lack of adequate funding,
and poor publicity by the U.S. Department of Education
and individual colleges and universities.
The Child
Protective Services Student Loan Forgiveness Act seeks
to remedy some
of those problems. First,
eligibility is limited to degreed social workers who work
in child welfare and second, the Department of Education
is directed to provide information on the program on its
website and to colleges and universities.
NASW provided input on similar bills
introduced in the last Congress (107th) by Rep.
Pete Stark (D-CA) and Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH). Strong
advocacy by social workers in Ohio resulted in this year’s
sponsorship by Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH). NASW
has endorsed the legislation.
While
the bill does not tackle all the problems facing the child
welfare
workforce, it does begin
to address the recruitment and retention of qualified professionals. It
also provides social workers with an opportunity to educate
Members of Congress on the value of social work training
in the provision of child welfare services and the need
to address other problems in the system.
Please contact your Members of Congress
TODAY!
TAKE ACTION NOW
THANKS FOR YOUR ADVOCACY! |