Tell Congress to Reject Bush Medicaid
Budget Cuts
February 8 , 2005
Issue
Socials workers strongly support the maintenance of a strong
health insurance safety net for vulnerable populations, and
s tate Medicaid programs provide the most critical safety net
for low-income Americans in need of health care services. Currently,
Medicaid provides coverage to 47 million Americans including
one-in four U.S. children, 4.1 million elderly, and seven million
blind and disabled individuals.
The President's budget request for fiscal year 2006 released
yesterday proposes $60 billion in cuts to Medicaid over 10
years. If enacted, these cuts will make deep reductions in
provider payments and reduce coverage for millions of recipients. Among
the services most hurt by the changes would be case management
services, which were singled out for heavy reductions ($11.7
billion over 10 years). The President also proposed over $15
billion in new Medicaid spending, so that the net spending
cut in the program equals $45 billion over 10 years.
The Medicaid changes recycle budget cuts proposed by the Administration
during its first term, which could make them harder to sell
to Congress this year. The budget cuts are generally limited
to reductions in payments to providers and states and they
avoid a block grant most feared by advocates of the program.
Beyond the cuts in case management services, Health and Human
Services Secretary Mike Leavitt described the cuts as closing "loopholes" that
allow middle-class seniors to receive benefits, prohibiting
what he called "accounting gimmicks" used by states
to receive more federal matching funds and eliminating excessive
spending on items such as prescription drugs.
Background
Bush's Medicaid budget proposals are expected to receive broad
support from fiscal conservatives in Congress, but many governors
and advocates are actively opposing deep reductions in the
program. Bush's plan for Medicaid this year is intended to
limit the increase in Medicaid spending over the next decade
to an average of 7.3 percent annually, compared to a projected
growth rate of 7.8 percent if cuts are not made. Families USA
estimates the net cut of $45 billion would equal the elimination
of 1.76 million children from current program eligibility by
2010.
The budget proposes two changes to Medicaid reimbursement
policy for case management services. First, the budget proposes
to clarify which services may be claimed under targeted case
management (TCM). Secondly, the Administration seeks lower
reimbursement for TCM services to the administrative matching
rate of 50 percent. The Administration argues that currently
states are shifting costs into Medicaid case management that
are the obligation of other programs and are using expanded
definitions of allowable services. These two proposals would
save $129 million in FY 2006 and $3.1 billion over five years
and 11.7 billion over 10 years. T he President's total plan
for $60 billion in cuts over ten years, includes the following
reductions:
- $15.0 billion in payment cuts to pharmacies
- $4.5 billion closing loopholes on asset
transfers from the elderly
- $11.9 billion from closing provider payment “schemes” (intergovernmental
transfers)
- $3.3 billion from mandatory cost-based
limits on providers
- $6.2 billion by phasing down of “safe
harbor” for state taxes on providers
- $1.4 billion in new limits on managed
care provider “taxes”
- $6.0 billion in caps on state administrative
claiming
- $4.0 billion from cut in targeted case
management matching rate
- $7.7 billion by avoiding federal cost
shifts from targeted case management and other services
Long-term, however, the budget proposes to give states more
flexibility to tailor their Medicaid programs to create a “more
sustainable cost structure.” Without offering explicit details
about how it might be restructured, the budget language emphasized
that the Administration plans to “build on the success” of
the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in modeling
the future Medicaid program. SCHIP is funded through a per
capita allotment, similar to a block grant, so states have
the ability to alter coverage relatively easily. Advocates
fear that the Administration could still be planning to impose
such caps on funding in Medicaid.
In 2003, the administration proposed an overhaul of the Medicaid
system in which states would be given more flexibility in running
their programs in return for a capped allotment of funds for
optional Medicaid populations, which include some nursing home
patients and certain low-income pregnant women and children
in families not meeting criteria for mandatory coverage. That
proposal failed in Congress, but it remains a popular approach
for cutting Medicaid among fiscal conservatives in Congress.
The Administration must work within the complex congressional
budget process to secure passage of these changes, and the
President's budget request yesterday started a process that
will go on for months. Over the next few weeks, Congress will
question Administration officials about the budget and develop
its own spending plan called a budget resolution. The budget
resolution includes a total for discretionary spending and
targets for revenues and entitlement spending. Congress will
consider cuts and caps on domestic discretionary and entitlement
spending, including Medicaid, during this process. The budget
resolution may do this in several ways: 1) by decreasing discretionary
or entitlement spending on programs in the budget resolution;
2) ordering congressional committees to pass legislation called “budget
reconciliation” to cut entitlements, including Medicaid, and/or
taxes; and/or 3) passing a budget process bill that would cap
all spending, cap entitlemen spending, cap discretionary spending
and/or institute “pay-as-you-go” rules for entitlement programs
only. These three separate budget bills are necessary to enact
all of the budget cuts the GOP leadership has indicated it
wants.
Action Requested
All Senators and Representatives must be contacted immediately
to hear opposition to the Bush Medicaid budget cuts. Please
call, fax, or e-mail your U.S. Representative and Senators
to request their support for protecting Medicaid from devastating
budget reductions. These contacts are essential over the next
two weeks as these members are forming their opinions about
their constituents' views of domestic spending cuts.
A sample letter opposing the Bush Medicaid budget request
has been posted on NASW's Congress Web to e-mail or fax to
Members of Congress. Individual telephone numbers, fax numbers,
and e-mail addresses are available through NASW's Congress
Web: www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/grassroots/congressweb.asp If
you make a phone call, please let us know via e-mail at advocacy@naswdc.org
The Congress will be on recess the week of February 18-27
giving constituents an opportunity to personally lobby their
representatives. NASW is asking its members to schedule local
visits with congressional representatives during that week
to discuss federal budget priorities. Within the next week,
NASW will be sending further materials to support members in
these visits.
Links for More Information
Members interested in background about the program or in tracking
this issue more carefully should check the following web sites:
For additional information, please contact Jim Finley,
senior government relations associate, at jfinley@naswdc.org or
202-336-8315. |