Figure 40-1
Sample Proposal Review Criteria
Selection Criteria |
Maximum
Points |
Points |
| 1. National significance |
30 |
_____ |
| 2. Quality of project design |
30 |
_____ |
| 3. Quality and potential contributions of personnel |
15 |
_____ |
| 4. Adequacy of resources |
15 |
_____ |
| 5. Quality of management plan |
10 |
_____ |
| Total |
100 |
_____ |
| Highly recommended for funding |
_____ |
| Recommended for funding |
_____ |
| Not recommended for funding |
_____ |
Each section may also be rated individually according to strengths and weaknesses.
For example, under quality of project design, the instructions to reviewers might read:
In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, consider the following:
(1) whether the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the project are clearly
specified and measurable and (2) whether a specific research design has been proposed and
the quality and appropriateness of that design, including the scientific rigor of the studies
involved.
Maximum points: 30
|
Excellent |
26-30 |
|
Good |
21-25 |
|
Fair |
16-20 |
|
Poor |
1-15 |
|
Missing |
0 |
Score _____
|
|
|
Top of Page 
Email this Link 
Print this page
