From the Director
Spring, and danger, in the air
By Elizabeth J. Clark, Ph.D., ACSW, MPH
I love May. It’s my favorite month — a month of rebirth and
sunshine. I especially like the concept of May Day where people around the
world celebrate the coming of spring.
But there is another meaning for May Day. Mayday is an
international distress signal that derives from the French “venez m’aider”
which means “come help me.” It is the equivalent of a Morse code for SOS, and
it is always said three times in succession so there can be no mistaking the
intent of the message.
This spring, I believe we need a universal distress signal for
women’s health and reproductive rights. In the last few months, we have seen
the worst attacks on women’s rights since before the passage of Roe v. Wade in
1973. These attacks have come in many guises and from oblique directions. They
have been couched in outcries of religious freedom, conscience clauses, cost
containment and paternalism. We have seen restrictions on Plan B, the emergency contraception pill, for younger women; a challenge
to insurance coverage of contraception for working women; and proposals for
required ultrasound procedures (transvaginal or otherwise) for women seeking
abortions. The latter has been couched in a mandate for health education and
informed consent — as though women seeking abortions do not have an adequate
understanding of the procedure, as though they haven’t already agonized over
their decisions.
American women and women’s groups have not been silent during
this turbulent spring. We watched women challenge the decision of the Susan B.
Komen Foundation to defund Planned Parenthood. We took issue with HHS’s
decision to limit Plan B to young women over 14. We were appalled by the
all-male House Oversight and Government Reform Committee panel on the use of
contraception, and the fact that Republicans would not let law student Sandra
Fluke speak because they felt she was not an expert about contraception. We
were further outraged by the personal attack on Fluke by radio talk show host
Rush Limbaugh, and we were puzzled by some of the Republican presidential
debates when patronizing and paternalistic candidates felt they needed to save
women from themselves.
On the other hand, we cheered with the defeat of the Blunt
amendment to allow religious groups to decline insurance coverage they morally
oppose. But this was a small win, one success in a larger skirmish. The real
battle for permanent women’s rights, especially our reproductive rights,
continues. Nearly 40 years after what we thought was the definitive victory, we
are still fending off attacks everywhere we turn.
 |
| NASW joins half a million pro-choice supporters in the 1992
“March for Women’s Lives” in Washington, D.C. |
Women are mobilizing and using various approaches in
opposition to these attacks, including a national petition on “End the War on
Women” and raising funds for a “women’s health rapid response fund.”
In response to the Virginia legislation to require a
transvaginal ultrasound prior to receiving an abortion, Women’s Strike Force
was born. This coalition, founded by former legislators of all political
affiliations in Virginia, is dedicated to recruiting and supporting all
candidates opposing any elected official who supported the mandatory ultrasound
or “personhood” legislation in the Virginia General Assembly. During the first
day, they raised more than $10,000.
Similarly, the Coalition to Protect Women’s Health Care was
created. It is a diverse coalition of 57 members, including NASW. CPWHC is
committed to protecting the current birth control coverage policy, the people
who made the policy, and our ability to make good policy in the future. Other
women’s groups, such as Planned Parenthood, the Feminist Majority and the
National Organization of Women, have also been active in garnering attention
through their advocacy outlets in response to the severe threat facing women’s
access to preventive health care.
With this column I’ve included a picture from 1992, when NASW
joined half a million pro-choice supporters in the “March for Women’s Lives” in
Washington, D.C. What is so striking to me are the two young girls on either
side of the sign, now both in their 30s. Those of us who participated in the
earlier movements did so with the hope that this would be the end of the
right-to-choose battles. The young women who are being most affected by the
attacks on their rights may not fully realize how hard-fought the battles of
the ’60s, ’70s, and ’80s were.
To this generation of young women, I say, “Mayday, mayday,
mayday.”
From May 2012 NASW News. © 2012 National
Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. NASW News
articles may be copied for personal use, but proper notice of
copyright and credit to the NASW News must appear on all copies
made. This permission does not apply to reproduction for advertising,
promotion, resale, or other commercial purposes.
|